Weathering images – where each one came from
Four of these came from Wikimedia Commons on 2026-09-03, each under a licence
that permits reproduction; the fifth is Andy’s own photograph. Every one is
credited in its caption on the page as well, because attribution that lives
only in a repository is not attribution.
If you add one: check the licence yourself, look at the image, and record it
here. A picture that shows the wrong mechanism is worse than no picture, and
the mechanism is often not visible in the picture – see both Minnesota entries.
corestones-lost-creek-colorado.jpg
Granite corestones and joint-bounded blocks, Lost Creek Wilderness, Colorado.
corestones-vedauwoo-wyoming.jpg
Turtle Rock, Vedauwoo – weathered Sherman Granite, Medicine Bow-Routt National
Forest, Albany County, Wyoming.
“Weathering of joint blocks and stages in the formation of corestones” – the
mechanism this exercise models, drawn.
weathering-rinds-galicia.jpg
Concentric spheroidal weathering rinds in granite, Estaca de Bares, A Coruña,
Galicia, Spain. A coin gives the scale.
corestones-quarry-minnesota.jpg
Corestones in a sand-and-gravel pit, southwestern Minnesota. They weathered in
place; the machinery moved them because they were in the way of the Glacial
River Warren sand and gravel being mined around them. Two things follow that
the caption has to say, because a reader would otherwise take both for natural:
the line they sit in is the excavator’s, and the material around them is
outwash rather than the grus they weathered out of.
- Photographer: Andy Wickert
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, granted by him for reuse.
- The two people in it are Kerry Callaghan (University of Illinois Chicago)
and Fiona Clubb (Durham University), included with their agreement.
- EXIF from the original, recorded here because the web copy is stripped:
Sony E5803 (Xperia Z5 Compact), original filename IMG_20171007_101620.jpg,
2017-10-07 10:16:21 GMT-05:00, 1920x1080, 1/2500 s, f/2.0, ISO 40, 4.23 mm.
- No location, and it is not recoverable from what was shared. The file has
no GPS IFD, no “GPS” bytes and no XMP; Google Photos’ own info panel for the
item shows date, camera and exposure but no place, and there is no map or
geocode in the page. So this is not a download stripping it: Google never had
one. Only the camera-roll original could still carry it. The pit is therefore
recorded as “southwestern Minnesota” on Andy’s word, which is the authority
here anyway – he was standing in it.
- Processing: JPEG quality 82, not resized. EXIF dropped on re-encode.
Considered and rejected
- Morton Outcrops Scientific and Natural Area, Minnesota (Morton Gneiss,
CC BY-SA 4.0, Tim Kiser). Rejected after looking at it. The outcrop is
glacially scoured, so its roundness is ice, not weathering – the opposite of
what this page teaches. Nothing suitable for Minnesota turned up on Commons;
the quarry photograph above came from Andy instead. Note that settling
whether those blocks were weathered in place or transported took asking him
– the photograph alone does not show it, which is the same test Morton failed.